Menu:
Evaluation
The evaluation had five aims:
1. to provide a
formative assessment of the environment and the modules that can inform
the design lifecycle. Here the need is to provide material that the
designer can use to enhance design and the modules, for example in
terms of improving the interaction, developing other modules, providing
material that will encourage links with other children and mainstream
activities
2. to assess the
extent to which the environment and the modules succeed in nurturing
the engagement of children with ASD, Children with ASD suffer from a
triad of impairments. To what extent does the environment address these
impairments, and provide opportunities for engagement
3. to contribute a
generic methodology which may be used to assess environments with
similar aims
4. to assess the
extent to which the modules were designed to meet the underlying
requirements, and the extent to which they met them in reality. The
difference being that the modules might have been designed with
requirements in mind, but design drift meant that initial requirements
were ignored, or poor design resulted in the failure to achieve the
requirements successfully.
5. to provide insight
into the operation of the PS environment in the school
The outcomes of the evaluation will be:
·
set of design recommendations for further development of the modules
that can be used in iterative development
·
a critical reflection on the approach taken to the evaluation which can
inform the research and development of other groups
·
an indication of the benefits individual children might have gained
through experiencing the environment
·
a cost benefit assessment of the environment in terms of the school
system, and provide recommendations for the use of future rooms
The evaluation focussed on:
·
the room and the activities that it supports
·
the functionality of the modules
·
the concept of PS in relation to the rest of the school
·
the benefits (or otherwise) the children derive from being in the space